Biopolym. Cell. 2002; 18(3):227-231.
Віруси та клітина
Клітинна селекція кормового буряку на стійкість до декількох
стресових факторів
- Інститут фізіології рослин і генетики НАН України
вул. Васильківська, 31/17, Київ, Україна, 03022
Abstract
Досліджено реакцію на хлоридне та сульфатне засолення калусних ліній кормового буряку, які мають перехресну стійкість до токсину збудника бактеріозу та низьких температур. Відібрано клітинні лінії, стійкі до трьох стресових
факторів – токсину збудника бактеріозу, низьких температур, а також одного із типів засолення – сульфатного або
хлоридного. З них отримано рослини-регенеранти та проведено їхній цитогенетшний аналіз.
Повний текст: (PDF, російською)
References
[1]
Lepoirve P., Carels N. Selection of sugar beet calli to obtain plants resistant to Cercospora beticola If Nuel. Techn. and in vitro Cult. Plant improv.: Proc. Int. Symp. (Vienna, 19—23 Aug. 1985). Vienna, 1986:305-8.
[2]
Zhuk YaP, Bobyr' AD, Sakhno TYa. Virus resistance regenerated plants obtained from dark green parts of the leaves of sugar beet, infected by beet mosaic virus. Sel-khoz biologiya. 1989; 3:68-70.
[3]
Zhuk YaP, Bobyr' AD, Sakhno TYa. Attenuation of virulence beet mosaic virus in tissue culture sugar beet. Dokl VASHNIL. 1991; 1:15-7.
[4]
Mangold B, Kraus J, Mechelke W, Buttner G. Resistenz gegenuber dem beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) bei konventionelli gezuchteten und gentechnisch ent wickelten linien und Sorten von Zuckerrruben. Milt. Biol. Bundesanst Land und Forstwist (Berlin). 1998;357:289-90.
[5]
Gorina IYa. Creating sugar beet forms resistant to environmentally safe herbicides in vitro. Methods of complex evaluation of the productivity and sustainability of agricultural plants: Proc. Scientific-metodol. meet. (Nemchynovka, 15—17 February, 1994). M, 1994. 10-1.
[6]
Chandler SF, Paek KY, Pua E-C, Ragolsky E, Mandal BB, Thorpe TA. The effectiveness of selection for salinity tolerance using in vitro shoot cultures. Bot Gaz. 1988;149(2):166-72.
[7]
Redko VV, Redko VI. Features reaction of sugar beet to salt stress. Genetic studies of sugar beet. Kiev: VNIISS, 1991:68-75.
[8]
Gubanova NYa, Dubrovnaya JV, Chuguncova TV. Selection and cytological analysis of mangel beet cell lines and their regenetants resistant of Pseudomonas syringae pv. aptata toxin. Tsitol Genet. 1999; 33(4):9-16.
[9]
Chugunkova TV, Shevtsov IA Cellular selection of beet for resistance to extreme environmental factors. Molecular. Genetics and Biotechnology: Proceedings of the Intern. Conf. (6-8 April 1998). Minsk, 1998;286-7.
[10]
Gubanova NYa, Dubrovnaya OV, Chugunkova TV. The selection and comparative analysis of resistance to salinity stress of callus cultures of mangel beet obtained from the explants of different ploidy. Fiziologiia i biokhimiia kul'turnykh rasteniy. 2000; 32(5):362-68.
[11]
Kuznetsov VV, Khydyrov BT, Roshchupkin BV, Borisova NN. Common system of cotton plant resistance to salinity and high temperatures: facts and hypotheses. Fiziologiia rasteniy. 1990; 37(5):987-91.
[12]
Litonova G. I, Zhukov Ya Ya, Yatsenko IA, Kuznetsov VV Changing genome expression in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings in response to salinity and effects of heavy metals. 3 Congress Proc. of the Society of Plant Physiologists. (24-29 June 1993,): Proc. Saint Petersburg, 1993;653.
[13]
Talanov VV, Titov AF, Minayeva SV, Soldatov SE. Separate and combined effects of salinity and temperature tempering plants. Fiziologiia rasteniy. 1993; 40(4)584-8.
[14]
Swaaij AC, Jacobsen E, Kiel JAKW, Feenstra WJ. Selection, characterization and regeneration of hydroxyproline-resistant cell lines of Solanum tuberosum: Tolerance to NaCl and freezing stress. Physiol Plant. 1986;68(3):359–66.
[15]
Kuznetsov VV, Khydyrov BT, Sheviakova NI, Rakitin VYu. Heat shock-induced salt resistance in cotton plants, participation of polyamines, ethylene and proline. Fiziologiia rasteniy. 1991; 38(6):1203-7.
[16]
Gubanova NYa, Dubrovnaya OV, Chugunkova TV. Complex in vitro selection of cell lines of mangel beet resistant to a toxin of bacteriosis pathogene and low temperatures. Biopolym Cell. 2000; 16(2):138-44.
[17]
Doley WP, Saunders JW. Hormone-free medium will support callus production and subsequent shoot regeneration from whole plant leaf explants in some sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) populations. Plant Cell Rep. 1989;8(4):222-5.
[18]
Kucherenko LA, Maddumage RP, Guzhov YuL. A method of determination of mass of callus tissue in the process of cultivation. Sel-khoz biologiya. 1991; 3: 84-5.
[19]
Freytag AH, Anand SC, Rao-Arelli AP, Owens LD. An improved medium for adventitious shoot formation and callus induction in Beta vulgaris L. in vitro. Plant Cell Rep. 1988;7(1):30-4.
[20]
Pausheva ZYa. Practicum on Plant Cytology. M, 1988; 280 p.
[21]
Shamina ZB. Methodological guidelines for cell selection. M.: VASKHNIL, 1984. 5 p.
[22]
Ghosh B. Plant responses to abiotic stress — an overview. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (India). 1996;66(1):21-34.
[23]
Keller H, Blein JP, Bonnet P, Ricci P. Physiological and molecular characteristics of elicitin-induced systemic acquired resistance in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1996;110(2):365-376.
[24]
Harrington HM, Alm DM. Interaction of heat and salt shock in cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 1988;88(3):618-25.
