Biopolym. Cell. 2004; 20(1-2):42-49.
Plant genome rearrangements in cell culture in vitro
1Andreev I. O., 1Spiridonova K. V., 1Kunakh V. A.
  1. Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine
    150, Akademika Zabolotnoho Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680


The paper summarizes the results of long-term investigation in vitro on the plant cells genome, which is the focus of research in the Department of Cell Population Genetics of IMBG NASU. The data obtained evidence the common features in the genome rearrangement pattern exhibited by plant cells in vitro and during natural speciation. In particular, the genome heterogeneity of cell populations in culture at the cytological level seems to be determined by the peculiarities of genome formation in the course of evolution. On the other hand, the correlation between rearrangements of specific DNA sequences in cell culture and their interspecies variations in intact plants has been found. Altogether the data allow to suggest that there are common principles determining the pattern and trends of the plant genome rearrangements in cell culture in vitro and during speciation. Therefore, given considerable mutation rate as against the intact plants, plant cell culture open new vistas for genome evolution research.


[1] White P.R. Potentially unlimited growth of excised plant callus in an artificial nutrient. Amer. J. Bot, 1939; 26(2):59-64.
[2] Gautheret R.J. Sur la possibilite de realiser la culture indefinie des tissus de tubercules de carote. C. R. Acad. Sci, 1939; 208:218-220.
[3] Terzi M., Sung R.S. Somatic cell genetics of plants. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol, 1986; 3 (4):303-330.
[4] Kunakh V. A. Genome variability in somatic plant cells. 7. Variability of population-genetic parameters in the culture in vitro. Biopolym. Cell. 2002; 18(5):377-393
[5] Kunakh VA. The evolution of plant genome in cell culture in vitro. Features, Causes, mechanisms and consequences. Genetics and breeding in Ukraine on the brink of the millennium. Kyiv, Logos, 2001. Vol. 1:53-67.
[6] Kunakh V. A. Genome variability of plant somatic cells. 1. Variability during ontogenesis. Biopolym. Cell. 1994; 10(6):5-35
[7] Kunakh VA. Plant genome variation in the course of in vitro dedifferentiation and callus formation. Fiziologiia rasteniy. 1999; 46(6):919-29.
[8] Solovyan VT, Kostenyuk IA, Kunakh VA. Genome changes in Rauwolfia serpentina Benth. cultivated in vitro. Genetika. 1987; 23(7):1200-8
[9] Solov'yan VT, Kunakh VA, Vershinin AV, Shumnyy VK. Comparison of the degree of homology and number of repetitive sequences in intact plants and cultured cells Rauwolfia serpentina. Doklady Akad Nauk Ukr SSR. Ser B. 1986; 278(4): 998-1000.
[10] Solovyan VT, Popovitch VA, Kunakh VA. Genome rearangement in Crepis capillaris L. (Wallr) cultured cells. Genetika. 1989; 25(10):1768-75.
[11] Flawell R., O'Dell M., Smith D. Repeated sequence DNA comparisons between Triticum and Aegilops species. Heredity, 1979 42:309-322.
[12] Salina EA, Timofeeva LL, Vershinin AV. nterspecies variability in the organization of repeated sequences of the genus Hordeum. Genetika. 1989;25(4):595-604.
[13] Solov'yan VT, Spiridonova EV, Kunakh VA. Genome rearrangements in cell culture of Rauwolfia serpentina. The diverse pattern of genome variations. Genetika. 1994; 30(2):250-4.
[14] Solov'yan VT, Spiridonova EV, Kunakh VA. Genome rearrangements in cultured Rauwolfia serpentina cells. II. Relation to interspecific variation. Genetika. 1994; 30(3):399-403.
[15] Solov'yan VT, Spiridonova YeV, Kunakh VA. Peculiarities of genome variability of cultured cells of Rauwolfia serpentina. Tsitol Genet. 1994; 28(5):21-25
[16] Spiridonova KV, Andreev IO, Solov'yan VT, Kunakh VA. Peculiarities of some gene rearrangement in the cell culture of Rauwolfia serpentina Benth. in vitro. Dopovidi Nats Akad Nauk Ukrainy. 2000; (2):165-70.
[17] Bennetzen JL. Transposable element contributions to plant gene and genome evolution. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;42(1):251-69.
[18] Grandbastien M. A. Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions. Trends Plant Sci. 1998; 3 (5):181-187.