Biopolym. Cell. 2016; 32(1):61-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7124/bc.00090E
Bioinformatics
Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies on Thermus thermophilus leucyl-tRNA synthetase complexed with different amino acids and pre-transfer editing substrates
1Rayevsky A. V., 1Tukalo M. A.
  1. Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine
    150, Akademika Zabolotnoho Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the structural bases for the amino acid selectivity of the Thermus thermophilus leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRSTT) aminoacylation site and to disclose the binding pattern of pre-transfer editing substrates. Methods. Eight amino acids proposed as semi-cognate substrates for aminoacylation and eight aminoacyl-adenylates (formed from AMP and eight amino acids) were prepared in zwitterions form. The protein structure with a co-crystallized substrate in the aminoacylation site [PDBID: 1OBH] was taken from RCSB. Docking settings and evaluation of substrate efficiency were followed by twofold docking function analysis for each conformation with Gold CCDC. The molecular dynamics simulation was performed using Gromacs. The procedures of relaxation and binding study were separated in two different subsequent simulations for 50ns and 5ns. Results. The evaluation of substrate efficiency for 8 amino acids by twofold docking function analysis, based on score values,has shown that the ligands of LeuRSTT can be positioned in the following order: Leu>Nva>Hcy>Nle>Met>Cys>Ile >Val. MD simulation has revealed lower electrostatic interactions of isoleucine with the active site of the enzyme compared with those for norvaline and leucine. In the case of aminoacyl-adenylates no significant differences were found based on score values for both GoldScore and Asp functions. Molecular dynamics of leucyl-, isoleucyl- and norvalyl-adenylates showed that the most stable and conformationally favorable is leucine, then follow norvaline and isoleucine. It has been also found that the TYR43 of the active site covers carboxyl group of leucine and norvaline like a shield and deflected towards isoleucine, allowing water molecules to come closer. Conclusions. In this study we revealed some structural basis for screening unfavorable substrates by shape, size and flexibility of a radical. The results obtained for different amino acids by molecular docking and MD studies well correlate with the experimental data on the first stage of aminoacylation. MD study of the aminoacyl-adenylates revealed that difficulty of some amino acids activation can be caused by two reasons: excessive flexibility due to the size or structure and quick hydrolysis of intermediate substrate with nucleophilic attack by water molecules.
Keywords: leucyl-tRNAsynthetase, editing, amino acids, aminoacyl-adenylate, molecular docking, MD simulations
Full text: (PDF, in English)

References

[1] Ibba M, Soll D. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:617-50.
[2] Cusack S, Berthet-Colominas C, Härtlein M, Nassar N, Leberman R. A second class of synthetase structure revealed by X-ray analysis of Escherichia coli seryl-tRNA synthetase at 2.5 A. Nature. 1990;347(6290):249-55.
[3] Eriani G, Delarue M, Poch O, Gangloff J, Moras D. Partition of tRNA synthetases into two classes based on mutually exclusive sets of sequence motifs. Nature. 1990;347(6289):203-6.
[4] Yadavalli SS, Ibba M. Quality control in aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis its role in translational fidelity. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2012;86:1-43.
[5] Fersht AR. Editing mechanisms in protein synthesis. Rejection of valine by the isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochemistry. 1977;16(5):1025-30.
[6] Cusack S, Yaremchuk A, Tukalo M. The 2 A crystal structure of leucyl-tRNA synthetase and its complex with a leucyl-adenylate analogue. EMBO J. 2000;19(10):2351-61.
[7] Martinis SA, Fox GE. Non-standard amino acid recognition by Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1997;36:125-8.
[8] Zhu B, Yao P, Tan M, Eriani G, Wang ED. tRNA-independent pretransfer editing by class I leucyl-tRNA synthetase. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(6):3418-24.
[9] Cvetesic N, Palencia A, Halasz I, Cusack S, Gruic-Sovulj I. The physiological target for LeuRS translational quality control is norvaline. EMBO J. 2014;33(15):1639-53.
[10] Lincecum TL Jr, Tukalo M, Yaremchuk A, Mursinna RS, Williams AM, Sproat BS, Van Den Eynde W, Link A, Van Calenbergh S, Grøtli M, Martinis SA, Cusack S. Structural and mechanistic basis of pre- and posttransfer editing by leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Mol Cell. 2003;11(4):951-63.
[11] Dulic M, Cvetesic N, Perona JJ, Gruic-Sovulj I. Partitioning of tRNA-dependent editing between pre- and post-transfer pathways in class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(31):23799-809.
[12] Boniecki MT, Vu MT, Betha AK, Martinis SA. CP1-dependent partitioning of pretransfer and posttransfer editing in leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(49):19223-8.
[13] Zhai Y, Martinis SA. Two conserved threonines collaborate in the Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase amino acid editing mechanism. Biochemistry. 2005;44(47):15437-43.
[14] Tan M, Zhu B, Zhou XL, He R, Chen X, Eriani G, Wang ED. tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing by prokaryotic leucyl-tRNA synthetase. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(5):3235-44.
[15] Case DA, Cheatham TE 3rd, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM Jr, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem. 2005;26(16):1668–88.
[16] Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14(1):33-8, 27-8.
[17] Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol. 1997;267(3):727-48.
[18] Pronk S, Páll S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, Shirts MR, Smith JC, Kasson PM, van der Spoel D, Hess B, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(7):845-54.
[19] Salnikov AO, Sliusar IA, Sudakov OO, Savytskyi OV, Kornelyuk AI. MolDynGrid virtual laboratory as a part of Ukrainian Academic Grid infrastructure. 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications. 2009; 237–40.
[20] Páll S, Abraham MJ, Kutzner C, Hess B, Lindahl E. Tackling exascale software challenges in molecular dynamics simulations with GROMACS. Solving Software Challenges for Exascale. 2015; 8759:3–27.
[21] Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins. 2006;65(3):712-25.
[22] Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79(2):926–35.
[23] Berendsen HJC,van der Spoel D,van Drunen R. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun. 1995; 91(1–2):43–56.
[24] Dulic M, Perona JJ, Gruic-Sovulj I. Determinants for tRNA-dependent pretransfer editing in the synthetic site of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochemistry. 2014;53(39):6189-98.