Biopolym. Cell. 1997; 13(1):30-35.
Structure and Function of Biopolymers
Effect of pH, ionic strength, and ionic composition on efficiency of hammerhead ribozyme-mediated cleavage of the tat-RNA HIV-I in vitro
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine
150, Akademika Zabolotnoho Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680
Abstract
The hammerhead ribozymes like other types of ribozymes are metalloenzymes, and their activity strongly depend on divalent metal ion presence. While influence of divalent metal ions on the cleavage of substrate by the hammerhead ribozymes was well characterised, effect of monovalent kations was not analyse systematically. In the present work influence of monovalent cations (H+, K+, Li+, NH4+) and buffer ions on efficiency of the tat-RNA cleavage in vitro by hammerhead ribozyme was characterized. pH-dependence was shown to be bell-shaped with an optimum at pH 7.0. Both K+ and Li+ ions at concentration 0.1 M increased, and at concentrations higher 0.2 M decreased efficiency of cleavage. At concentration 0.8 M reaction seemed to be completely blocked. NH4+ ions had inhibitory effect at all concentrations tested. The data presented here suggest specificity of interactions of monovalent cations with ribozyme RNA, that might promote, or vice versa, prevent forming active hammerhead conformation.
Full text: (PDF, in Russian)
References
[1]
Sheldon CC, Jeffries AC, Davies C, Symons RH. RNA self-cleavage by the hammerhead structure. Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology; 1990;227-42.
[2]
Fedor MJ, Uhlenbeck OC. Substrate sequence effects on "hammerhead" RNA catalytic efficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(5):1668-72.
[3]
Fedor MJ, Uhlenbeck OC. Kinetics of intermolecular cleavage by hammerhead ribozymes. Biochemistry. 1992;31(48):12042-54.
[4]
Hertel KJ, Uhlenbeck OC. The internal equilibrium of the hammerhead ribozyme reaction. Biochemistry. 1995;34(5):1744-9.
[5]
Heidenreich O, Eckstein F. Hammerhead ribozyme-mediated cleavage of the long terminal repeat RNA of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(3):1904-9.
[6]
Ellis J, Rogers J. Design and specificity of hammerhead ribozymes against calretinin mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21(22):5171-8.
[7]
Buryanovsky LN, Schved AD. In vitro specific cleavage of HIV-1 tat-RNA by catalytically active polyribonucleotide, ribozyme. Biopolym Cell. 1996; 12(2):20-3.
[8]
Buryanovsky LN, Shved AD. Characterization of catalytic activity in vitro of the ribozyme targeted to tat-RNA of HIV-I. Biopolym Cell. 1996; 12(6):69-73.
[10]
Dahm SC, Derrick WB, Uhlenbeck OC. Evidence for the role of solvated metal hydroxide in the hammerhead cleavage mechanism. Biochemistry. 1993;32(48):13040-5.
[11]
Breslow R, Xu R. Recognition and catalysis in nucleic acid chemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(4):1201-7.
[12]
Breslow R, Labelle M. Sequential general base-acid catalysis in the hydrolysis of RNA by imidazole. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108(10):2655–9.
[13]
Saenger W. Principles of nucleic acid structure. New York: Springer, 1984; 556 p. (124-127)
[14]
Pley HW, Flaherty KM, McKay DB. Three-dimensional structure of a hammerhead ribozyme. Nature. 1994;372(6501):68-74.
[15]
Hertel KJ, Pardi A, Uhlenbeck OC, Koizumi M, Ohtsuka E, Uesugi S, Cedergren R, Eckstein F, Gerlach WL, Hodgson R, et al. Numbering system for the hammerhead. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(12):3252.
[16]
Cantor CR, Schimmel PR. Biophysical Chemistry: Part I: The Conformation of Biological Macromolecules (Their Biophysical Chemistry; PT. 1) 1980 365 p.
[17]
Draper DE, Xing Y, Laing LG. Thermodynamics of RNA unfolding: stabilization of a ribosomal RNA tertiary structure by thiostrepton and ammonium ion. J Mol Biol. 1995;249(2):231-8.
[18]
Heus HA, Uhlenbeck OC, Pardi A. Sequence-dependent structural variations of hammerhead RNA enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(5):1103-8.
[19]
Woisard A, Fourrey JL, Favre A. Multiple folded conformations of a hammerhead ribozyme domain under cleavage conditions. J Mol Biol. 1994;239(3):366-70.
[20]
Alden CJ, Kim SH. Solvent-accessible surfaces of nucleic acids. J Mol Biol. 1979;132(3):411-34.