Biopolym. Cell. 2008; 24(2):105-111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7124/bc.000797
Structure and Function of Biopolymers
Reversibility of DNA loops exit during single cell gel electrophoresis
1Afanasieva K. S., 1Shuvalova T. A., 1Zazhytska M. O., 1Sivolob A. V.
  1. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
    64, Volodymyrska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601

Abstract

The kinetics of DNA exit during single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) of human lymphocytes has been investigated. The electrophoresis was performed at neutral pH in the absence/presence of different ethidium bromide concentrations. The dependence demonstrated of DNA exit efficiency on ethidium bromide concentration points out that the comet tail consists of DNA loop domains extended by the electric field. The loop exit is facilitated significantly by relaxed DNA torsional constraint. However, the disappearance of comets was observed after switching off the electric field at the condition of some constraint in the extended loops. Several possibilities of applications of discovered effects to improve the comet assay were discussed.
Keywords: comet assay, loop domains, ethidium bromide, DNA torsional constraint
Full text: (PDF, in English) (PDF, in Russian)

References

[1] Olive PL. The comet assay. An overview of techniques. Methods Mol Biol. 2002;203:179-94.
[2] Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol. 2004;26(3):249-61.
[3] Moller P. The alkaline comet assay: towards validation in biomonitoring of DNA damaging exposures. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98(4):336-45.
[4] Cook PR, Brazell IA, Jost E. Characterization of nuclear structures containing superhelical DNA. J Cell Sci. 1976;22(2):303-24.
[5] Hartmann A, Agurell E, Beevers C, Brendler-Schwaab S, Burlinson B, Clay P, Collins A, Smith A, Speit G, Thybaud V, Tice RR; 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. Mutagenesis. 2003;18(1):45-51.
[6] Horvathova E1, Dusinska M, Shaposhnikov S, Collins AR. DNA damage and repair measured in different genomic regions using the comet assay with fluorescent in situ hybridization. Mutagenesis. 2004;19(4):269-76.
[7] Collins AR, Dobson VL, Dusinska M, Kennedy G, Stetina R. The comet assay: what can it really tell us? Mutat Res. 1997;375(2):183-93.
[8] Simpson RT, Thoma F, Brubaker JM. Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell. 1985;42(3):799-808.
[9] Bauer W, Vinograd J. Interaction of closed circular DNA with intercalative dyes. II. The free energy of superhelix formation in SV40 DNA. J Mol Biol. 1970;47(3):419-35.
[10] Sivolob A, De Lucia F, Revet B, Prunell A. Nucleosome dynamics. II. High flexibility of nucleosome entering and exiting DNAs to positive crossing. An ethidium bromide fluorescence study of mononucleosomes on DNA minicircles. J Mol Biol. 1999;285(3):1081-99.
[11] Benham CJ. Energetics of the strand separation transition in superhelical DNA. J Mol Biol. 1992;225(3):835-47.
[12] Sivolob A, Prunell A. Nucleosome dynamics V. Ethidium bromide versus histone tails in modulating ethidium bromide-driven tetrasome chiral transition. A fluorescence study of tetrasomes on DNA minicircles. J Mol Biol. 2000;295(1):41-53.
[13] Moller P. Assessment of reference values for DNA damage detected by the comet assay in human blood cell DNA. Mutat Res. 2006;612(2):84-104.